Top Security Incidents of 2025: Chrome Browser 0-Day Vulnerability Exploitation

Top Security Incidents of 2025: Chrome Browser 0-Day Vulnerability Exploitation

February 18, 2026 | NSFOCUS

Background

In March 2025, cybersecurity researchers disclosed a highly sophisticated targeted attack campaign named “Operation ForumTroll.” Orchestrated by an unidentified state-sponsored APT group, the operation leveraged a Google Chrome 0-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-2783) as its core weapon. This vulnerability enabled sandbox escape, allowing arbitrary code execution on victims’ Windows systems and granting full control over the targeted machines.

Operation ForumTroll demonstrated exceptional professionalism in constructing its attack chain. The campaign began with a precision spear-phishing operation. The attackers conducted in-depth research on their target demographic, meticulously forging an official conference invitation from “Primakov Readings”, a well-known Russian academic forum. The fake invitations were distributed via email to specific scientists and scholars. The embedded link directed victims to a cloned website, nearly identical to the legitimate forum. Upon visiting the site, hidden exploit code was triggered, compromising the user’s system. Notably, the attackers employed short-lived domain techniques to conceal their real command-and-control (C&C) servers. After a successful breach, the malicious link automatically redirected users to the genuine forum website, effectively erasing traces of the attack and prolonging the lifespan of their infrastructure.

Event Analysis

A deep technical analysis reveals that this attack was far from an isolated incident. The payload demonstrated high modularity and evasion capabilities. The initial exploit was solely responsible for escaping the browser sandbox and gaining system privileges, after which a second-stage loader was downloaded from the cloud. This loader employed a range of advanced anti-analysis techniques, including virtual machine detection, sandbox environment awareness, and security software process inspection, ensuring activation only in genuine target environments. The final payload deployed was a custom spyware trojan named “Dante”, integrating multiple surveillance and data exfiltration functions—such as keylogging, screenshot capture, file theft, and remote command execution. Its communication traffic was heavily encrypted and disguised as legitimate HTTPS traffic to evade network-level detection.

The Operation ForumTroll incident sounds a new alarm for the global cybersecurity community. It underscores how state-sponsored APT groups continue to target foundational software ecosystems, particularly widely used applications like the Chrome browser. Attackers not only possess the capability to discover and exploit zero-day vulnerabilities but also exhibit mastery in social engineering deception, attack chain obfuscation, and payload persistence. For critical infrastructure and sensitive industries reliant on such software, adopting an “Assume Breach” zero-trust mindset is essential. Building a multi-layered defense system covering endpoints, networks, and the cloud—while enhancing advanced threat hunting capabilities is the effective way to counter these stealthy and impactful targeted attacks.

Summary

As digital transformation accelerates, the cybersecurity threat landscape in 2025 has reached unprecedented levels of complexity and diversity. Attack groups continue to evolve in technical sophistication, attack methodologies, and evasion capabilities, demonstrating highly professionalized, industrialized, and stealthy characteristics.

Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) payloads are increasingly adopting fileless and polymorphic forms. Attackers are breaking conventional technical frameworks, developing more covert and resilient attack vectors. A prime example is the ChainedShark APT group, which employs executable file reconstruction techniques. Unlike traditional file format conversion, this method deconstructs and reassembles PE files into shellcode, achieving deep payload concealment. The process involves extracting and merging core components—such as code, data, and import tables—before embedding specialized initialization routines. The resulting shellcode, fragmented and nearing 3MB in size, far exceeds typical shellcode dimensions, indicating that attackers have automated and weaponized this technique.

Meanwhile, the Lazarus Group has showcased multi-signature hijacking in the blockchain sector, representing a new zenith in APT attack sophistication. This supply-chain-based attack leverages malicious smart contracts and delegated call hijacking to deceive high-level ByBit executives into granting multi-signature authorization. The attackers initially gained control over Safe{Wallet}’s online codebase via phishing, then modified JavaScript to hijack the multi-signature process. The brilliance of this technique lies in its ability to manipulate transaction logic without disrupting existing security mechanisms, achieving full control over fund transfers.

Vulnerability exploitation has become increasingly sophisticated, and sandbox escape capabilities are reaching new heights. The Chrome sandbox escape 0-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-2783), exploited in the Operation ForumTroll campaign, demonstrates the attackers’ deep understanding of low-level system mechanisms. This high-severity browser vulnerability leveraged a design flaw in Chromium’s inter-process communication (IPC) mechanism, enabling attackers to illegally obtain thread handles within browser processes and achieve sandbox escape. Specifically, the attackers discovered that Chromium’s browser process only validated process pseudo-handles (-1) while overlooking thread pseudo-handles (-2). By exploiting this oversight, they successfully injected malicious code into the browser process.

This refined vulnerability exploitation technique reveals that modern cyber attackers are no longer confined to exploiting simple memory corruption flaws. Instead, they are delving into the interaction logic between system components, identifying and weaponizing subtle yet critical design flaws in complex software systems. This shift poses new challenges for software security and vulnerability defense, demanding more nuanced and proactive protection strategies.